Length of the research phase
Time between receiving the file and the first complete draft of the response plan.
Use case
You have already answered a near-identical requirement, in a file from three years ago, written by someone who has since moved department. The problem is not the writing: it is the finding.
A specification lands with two hundred and forty requirements and a three-week deadline. The team spends the first week reading, the second hunting for material already produced, and the third writing in a rush whatever it failed to find.
Almost all the material exists: past technical submissions, calculation notes, reference sheets, certificates. It is scattered across project folders and named according to each person's habits.
Every requirement in the specification is compared against your history. The system returns passages already written on an equivalent subject, with the originating file and its date.
Requirements with no equivalent in your history stand out clearly. That is the list of what actually has to be written, and the most useful input to the bid or no-bid decision.
Penalties, warranties, transfers of liability: wording that departs from your usual contractual practice is surfaced for arbitration, with the exact text.
Clairdex does not write your response for you and gives no legal opinion. It finds, matches and cites. The decision to reuse a passage, update it or drop it stays yours.
Time between receiving the file and the first complete draft of the response plan.
The share of requirements covered by an existing passage that was found, rather than rewritten.
How many files are dropped early on a documented basis, rather than after two weeks of work.
Request an assessment
Describe your document volumes, the systems they sit in, and the business question that costs you the most time. We reply within two working days, in English, French or German.